11/22/2023 0 Comments Distal radius fracture classificationWhen the small corner of the metaphysis is visible, this is known as a corner sign or Thurston-Holland fragment.īe careful in using the terms proximal and distal to describe the extension because the position of the physis is relative to the metaphysis and is not fixed. These are most common and occur away from the joint space. These are when the fracture extends through both the physis and metaphysis. ![]() An example is Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE). Diagnosis is based on clinical findings, such as the presence of focal tenderness or swelling surrounding the growth plate. Look for the widening of the physis or displacement of the epiphysis, which may suggest a fracture. A radiograph may be normal due to lack of bony involvement, and mild to moderate soft tissue swelling may be noted. Beware that a normal radiograph cannot exclude a physis injury in a symptomatic pediatric patient. Type I fractures are due to the longitudinal force applied through the physis, which splits the epiphysis from the metaphysis. This is when the fracture line extends through the physis or within the growth plate. Higher-grade Salter-Harris fractures have a higher incidence of premature physeal fusion. Ranging from I to V, lower numbers are less severe and have less of a propensity for growth abnormalities. ![]() The most common patient was an eldery woman who sustained a distal radius fracture through a simple fall in her own residence, and whose fracture was extra-articluar and treated non-surgically.ĭistal radius fracture Epidemiology Fracture classification Register study Surgical treatment Swedish fracture register.Salter-Harris fractures include a classification system that allows providers to risk-stratify injuries. This nation-wide observational study provides comprehensive data on the epidemiology, fracture classification and current treatment regimens of distal radius fractures in a western European setting. Only 18% of the AO-23-A fractures were treated surgically, compared to 48% of the AO-23-C fractures. One third (33%, n = 7783/21,723) of all fractures occurred at the patients' residence. A simple fall was the most common cause of injury (75%, n = 17,643/23,394). Nominal variables were presented as proportions of all registered fractures.Ī total of 23,394 distal radius fractures in 22,962 patients were identified. Included were all non-pathological distal radius fractures registered between January 1st 2015 and December 31st 2017 in patients aged 18 years and above. ![]() We performed a descriptive study using prospectively registered data from the Swedish fracture register. ![]() The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology, fracture classification, current treatment regimens and mortality of distal radius fractures in adults within the context of a large national register study. Few nation-wide studies on distal radius fracture epidemiology and treatment exist, none of which provide detailed data on patient and injury characteristics, fracture pattern and mortality. Previous studies report substantial changes in treatment trends in recent decades. Distal radius fractures are the most common of all fractures.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |